Ridge and Arco Shorts both have owners who wanted more length. Resolve that shared limit before debating polyester and nylon: a different fabric cannot add the coverage you need.
Two returns, one useful first check
Chase returned Ridge Short because it was shorter than he wanted; Randy returned Arco Short despite otherwise liking it. Neither comment supplies a verified current inseam. Use the sitting-and-stepping check on the exact size.
| After the hem works | Ridge Short | Arco Short |
|---|---|---|
| Fabric | Four-way stretch polyester; percentages not supplied | 93% nylon / 7% spandex |
| Activity-specific evidence | Fishing and sweaty hiking drying impressions | Detailed account covers three wears; future safari excluded |
| Fit concern | Waist can fit while thighs/seat feel tight | Small sample does not settle shape across builds |
| Pocket issue | Mesh snagging reported; others like zip storage | Zip-close cargo listed; early hardware praise |
Chris’s Arco account supports satisfaction with the fabric and closures after short use. Francis’s Ridge account supports drying comfort in a different activity. Neither proves a material winner. Load your normal pockets and reject a tight seated fit before comparing secondary features.
